No. 23-6982
Paulius Telamy v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Tags: brady-v-maryland brady-violation civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-suppression favorable-evidence postconviction-relief prosecutorial-misconduct suppressed-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, under Brady v. Maryland, the prosecution suppressed favorable evidence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether, reasonable jurists could debate whether, under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1968), the prosecution suppressed favorable evidence at Petitioner’s trial. i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-21
Waiver of right of respondent Rickey Dixon to respond filed.
2024-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 12, 2024)
Attorneys
Paulius Telamy
Janice L. Bergmann — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Rickey Dixon
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent