No. 23-6984
Chikezie Ottah v. Verifone System Inc.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 35-usc-101 civil-procedure constitutional-provisions court-jurisdiction judicial-review legal-interpretation patent-eligibility patent-law procedural-rules standing statutory-provisions takings
Key Terms:
Patent
Patent
Latest Conference:
2024-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the question of law presented in the petition for writ of certiorari should be reviewed
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A |e gay THE Qustion oe Lay 2 PR tion Re REV ON Pr TEx? riFeid~ Gam ENT 3. PRified fart ae Yon {HR Fools oF US Yo PANT ’ g & PEfot fea REVIEW ON dE nieve Tarcpin AGMA, WME ABOVE He hot CASE £ PETIZIOd FOL REE, AVIS arp ANT rlbs DR Alo vO 87a PRP oy zoe) AGmne7 US Bie PATENT a t eo Cas WY, nly a zo Prewd omer F cihaneetish prcousk | ae O# Alove te AS | Days coves ( . ag tat to ZV nl Pett. 10 TRL) SF Tas fice wil Tate Cass | hed fee 1 ne novo) | Wi A oO us pret 4/201, O12 C Me rI ! F ea ——— ™
Docket Entries
2024-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-04-05
Waiver of right of respondent VeriFone Systems, Inc. to respond filed.
2024-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2024)
Attorneys
VeriFone Systems, Inc.
Carolyn Chang — Marton Ribera Schumann & Chang LLP, Respondent
Carolyn Chang — Marton Ribera Schumann & Chang LLP, Respondent