No. 23-6989
Lenroy McLean v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion co-defendants compassionate-release criminal-sentencing due-process equal-protection federal-procedure judicial-discretion post-conviction-relief sentencing-factors
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court properly applied the evaluation of the sect. 3553 factors among differently situated co-defendant to denied Petitioner's compassionate release?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Whether the lower court properly applied the evaluation of the sect. 3553 factors among differently situated co-defendant to denied Petitioner's compassionate release ? ITI. Whether the lower court corruptly altered, mutilates or concealed information ; with the intent to impair the object's intergrity of availability for usage at the Supreme court level?? III. Should circuit court judge(s) sitting by designation within the lower court have influences within the official proceeding on appeal ? 2 oa
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2024)
Attorneys
Lenroy McLean
Lenroy McLean — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent