No. 23-6995

Rosaura Strous v. Superior Court of California, Yuma County

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights disability-discrimination disability-rights due-process employment-law judicial-procedure sexual-discrimination sexual-harassment standing
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What claims did you raise to the court below?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : Question 1) What claims did you raise to the court below? / . Claims of sexual harassment that have not been addressed. Sexual ; discrimination as well as violation of my rights due to a disability. : Question 2) What do you think the court below did wrong? : The court made a decision without allowing the appellanttobe —. heard. Ana m2 fo OL prtsend 40. af, mand aNnoguhir Ui 0212097, bith PAu MOF s nt Question 3} Why are thesé errors seriou ih WH Spe ORES F A forward? : it is a violation of the appellant’s rights and sexual harassment is a | serious allegation that was not addressed and simply dismissed as “ frivolous.

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-09-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-14
Petition for Rehearing filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2023-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2024)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

Rosaura Strous
Rosaura Strous — Petitioner
Rosaura Strous — Petitioner