Should the US Supreme Court allow government officials to engage in discriminatory conduct without consequence?

No question identified. : QUESTIONS(S) PRESENTED Question 1: The Massachusetts Government is entrusted by its people to govern fairly and rationally. This lawsuit accuses its state government agencies, the governor and administrators of acting illegally and prejudicially. Should the US Supreme Court let them get away with their misbehaviors or actions without re-evaluation and consequence? Question 2: Should the judicial system of the United States allow the defendants of this case go unpunished or unreprimanded for their violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14° Amendment of the US Constitution? Question 3: Should Class of One victims of discriminations be neglected and take a back seat in the grievance process of the US judicial system? Before the codifications of Protected Classes in civil rights advancement, wasn't it true that civil rights pioneers like Rosa Park and James Meredith were all Class of One discrimination victims in the fifties and sixties? Therefore, should Class of One victims enjoy the same level of legal consideration as the codified Protected Classes? Question 4: How far could the 2 landmark cases law of Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 173 L. Ed. 2d 868 (2009) and Engquist v. Oregon Dep't of Agric., 553 U.S. 591, 603 (2008) go in protecting de facto violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14° Amendment of the US Constitution committed by government officials? Ashcroft and Engquist rulings actually were never meant to protect perpetrators of discriminations recklessly. They have certain rational limits and boundaries. This Petition of Writ of Certiorari aims to uncover the limits and boundaries of these 2 legal rulings. : :