Whether the Supreme Court's decision affirmed the Appellant Court is an abuse of discretion and against the rule of law

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. De Novo: Whether the Supreme Court’s decision, affirmed the Appellant Court is an abuse of discretion and against the rule of law . finding Porter “Notice of Appeal” emailed to the ALJ is contrary to Kentucky Appellant/ Supreme Court rulings: 2. De Novo: Kentucky Workers Compensation statute 803 KAR , 25:010 Sect. 22 and KRS 342.285 are unconstitutional, vague, unclear, ; ambiguous and fails to notify claimants of their right to Appeal the ALJ’s decision on award or order. 3. De Novo: 18 U.S. Code § 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law the ALJ, Porter’s attorney, Berger and defense attorney conspired to conceal filing of the defendant’s medical witness disguised as : plaintiff's evidence; lunched a prima facie case of fraud /