No. 23-7008

Lawrence Martin v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment brady-violation civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process exculpatory-evidence federal-court new-trial relief trial-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-04-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was Martin entitled to production of documents, did a Brady violation occur when favorable material evidence was withheld/discarded, was Martin entitled to a new trial in federal court for Brady violation, do Brady violations provide Martin a mechanism for relief under the 6th Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \. FeneRAL QuestTioN,s Dip THE SUPREME CoURT BF TRE UNITEO STATES Mail MARTIN PRVES IN HIS il/ &/2622 . AND W/12/2022 LEGAL Matis. LZ. was MARTIN ENTITLED To Ruce 19 PRopvcrioN oF poCumMENTS, 3. DiD A BRADY VIOLATION 6cCUR WHEN FavoeaABLlE waTERsAL EviOENCE WAS WitrHHELO, DISCARDED. MoooOWaAS) MARTIN ENTITLED To A New TRIAL IN FEDERAL couRT FoR BRAPY Vidlarion. . 5. Becaust of BRAPY VitlaTioNs D6ES THE tU+TH AmENDwent PRovVides Maenon A Mecuanism FoR ReElier. 2.

Docket Entries

2024-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/19/2024.
2024-03-28
Waiver of right of respondent Dexter Payne to respond filed.
2024-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2024)

Attorneys

Dexter Payne
Michael Anthony CantrellOffice of the Arkansas Attorney General, Respondent
Michael Anthony CantrellOffice of the Arkansas Attorney General, Respondent
Lawrence Martin
Lawrence Martin — Petitioner
Lawrence Martin — Petitioner