No. 23-7012
Michael Deangelo Lowery v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-review habeas-corpus judicial-procedure morris-defendant post-conviction-relief procedural-barriers standing treaty-rights
Latest Conference:
2024-05-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Oklahoma's Post-Conviction Procedure Act is adequate
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (i) whe thor Olelakornae's Pct. Comiction Pacodure Aet ts Adeguate @® whether ORlaboma violetes ifs own law in an effort t Aen when it agglcd ibs new rite. of bscrninad poceduce (State exrel Matloft v.. Wallace, 447 PBA Lele) rehaachvely to Pesitioner 's pest tonvichon proweding ® @ whether Mendprmons y, hewitieat 577 Us (46 C201) reguires badomna ; herp rte its proeduril barriers, 7) meke Q Yerits Pinna of fedi boners fiisdicionel dlaim, which wes premised on provisions in “Freptios between the Nailed States and Choctaw Nation when spresested on Callatemh eviewé
Docket Entries
2024-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2024)