Is the panel decision in conflict with Boumediene v. Bush, in suspending the Writ of Habeas Corpus when a misinterpretation of law is being used to detain the defendant and direct appeal proceedings are inadequate to protect liberty interests in case with plain lack of probable cause?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Is the panel decision in conflict with Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723, 779-80, 128 S. Ct. 2229 (2008), in suspending the Writ of Habeas Corpus when a misinterpretation of law is being used to detain the defendant and direct appeal proceedings are inadequate to protect liberty interests in case with plain lack of probable cause? ii a ua