Whether petitioner's constitutional rights were violated when he was convicted, and whether he was properly denied notice and an opportunity to prove his claims in federal habeas corpus proceedings

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Diedvics Toe fee serneone who is ok e \ ¢ ted . AO) Fea onvicked | . were Brig case “sey and iwtentrondly, Te y \ NAY 3 . Drate court . the WS, (2) Does petitioner be eet Femonded 2 Properly Wed o Notice & Kemovol ho Vrove come bak te ee pease Wik a Visteick Courts a a & \nited States Di abeos Corpus in the Stak . \shhondlin AY vb S$ District Court e \ @ Courts only to (2) Ace the Temedies A@h ‘) @ Novice of Remevel Years later, to address the WS ge (QS) 2 resent when She U.S, courts =~ as one of petitioner's ‘ggounds ? WTR ane Stete of Calorade Sad * elote 2B USC. 8.458 (HIE), OW), Defender. ott; al ore io Kinds perivioner Comperenk vithos Wie, GNGENEST TN BF saa cm at Hycon the Sete Ble (5) Con dhe , on petitioners behalf Drate of Colorades, P. banal? with olorade’s, ublic Defend re, . Yar \ A on w\ Knowledge oF Consent Ta N Nee action te Me an oppecl On Ww . \is Woy Bends Toised “are not he wretkere with my \eacl skrokeay it \ Vabeas C legal \S) ny 9 NN . ) Te he by 6k orpus ¢ grounds petitioner Wants \o reise in Pp dorado Revised D+ eA “ , wn The perSorenance & otuke 1$-3-204 (2 . NRT eta of \is or \er dukes. ae Energy Medical Service Pro id Spokube Bom ee) ge ak section 1G whe oWicer, as described ees engaged Mediec Service ay ot Trrough \G-9.5(52. N eas & the Cadorad Rent \ Weer, Emergenc: Medical C an Come You co “8 euised (1) ut ‘ ave Provider . wot Sind E + TD am nok under a investigation Yee orson n or oo FiceBiduter ? Mergency ®) ' a Stop and WO KKMe Was Commi ed? Con veckignters arrest or peclorm a ow come L can onl ; . , Seevice Reovdere. . NY ‘sve Erneegensy Medical Care Providers ond © in Yee rivet “A. . meragin Wedi to Colorado Revised Saat age and wet in theie oficial * an . ical () Is Yrese a Ting, Yee ¥ Nek 4 pacity’s. pursuant AWW) Ts there a Sj 4 Kee Ne \ n ot Removal ? wn cm For a Me . (it) TS The United Stokes Disha nee ol Removal § ; Yorms on Xneie welosii istrict Cours F Carorado d Nodice AY Qewme eostte does $hnat sk © does Nok have Nokce AN QR | emoval ¢ op the petitioner from Bling \i cmon " Dove he United Stodes Court of Aopecl oy ‘S Owl case a en 3 ~ ourT o ols ‘ack Tele 2% ‘een remand ov an evidenty View Ack The record to see Ae SL. 8 (455 (MW) and Ch)? Q has been \rod 2 Pursuant te QUESTIONGE) YRESENTED ‘a ve ao new kei be considered Soule 4 jeepordy wa Syeke. or Vedecod cous? YA) Was Xe Proper procedure Vox Me WS. Court & Moveck down vo Ye WS. Districk Court to . . Peas to remond ‘he cose back procedvsal vecove? Disksick Court Yo avko-corceck Yhe US. Dishrick courks (as) \Nhwk are he whendions or Porpose SX the US. Distick Court RY Cdorado ot US. Gourk of Kopeats Yor Bre Teeth Circuit nok Ye Vonor a Nokice x Removol Sean o Noocish Americon Naekional ?