No. 23-7016

Gregory Chatten Stockman v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2024-03-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-review criminal-procedure due-process evidence judicial-interpretation patent-infringement patent-licensing standing state-court-review
Latest Conference: 2024-05-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the terms and conditions of a patent license agreement are admissible as evidence in a patent infringement case

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED _. Sn the MH, Sonome County Condi tonak Relocate. Progean, the terns hind . _ Condy tons of ourpatent thenrment for Oregony Stockimta. on August _ _ 14, 201; the 1B Pages, lu d Raum up al a SVP (sured rolint: pedir) : ; Contrrer ey bn. katie. Messenotl, Contep Prosram Managers. eit Dye During my Sonoma. County Sepers-Counr hear (uty A5,a41,28 2007 Augusr ) The presiding Tualge. wou Dove. ronda rh a nt a Nar See..0n Rete. The. 13 page. Conreps TERMS gnc. Condctions, Thay Potlounne StileMunil. 00 280 trontored 1ยป the Cour of Oppeok, Stuteof Colformm (ST Appellate Disteer, Diwsyor onus 7 Evidene Code โ€”โ€” . Seeron, 1211) | a Sethe, aS | Oo No Connsp: Tezms amt Condrhery 1x Courr evicbmee. Bx Rettreug a DR. Ikahe, Messerolt, Festommy of, Augusr |, 3or7 _ Reporteo Mewmme, Murphy (SR |/5%a

Docket Entries

2024-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2023-04-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2024)

Attorneys

Gregory Chatten Stockman
Gregory Chatten Stockman — Petitioner
Gregory Chatten Stockman — Petitioner