No. 23-7017

Cyrus Hazari v. Superior Court of California, Santa Clara County, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: ada americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights constitutional-protections disability disability-rights due-process fair-play judicial-discrimination legal-access self-represented systemic-bias
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment FourthAmendment Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-05-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do state and federal jurisprudence systemically eliminate rights and access to legal remedies for self-represented disabled litigants with invisible disabilities?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Do state and federal jurisprudence systemically eliminate rights and access to legal remedies for self-represented disabled litigants with invisible disabilities? 2. Does the treatment of self-represented litigants with disability by judges and courts, in the course of state and federal jurisprudence, violate a) the Constitution of the United States, b) United States laws, with particular attention to international treaties, c) traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice? 3. Has the Amendment to the Americans with Disabilities Act failed? . ii fo 3 .

Docket Entries

2024-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2023-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2024)

Attorneys

Cyrus Hazari
Cyrus Hazari — Petitioner
Cyrus Hazari — Petitioner