No. 23-7031

Bryan Lee Gregory v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights conflict-of-interest due-process fair-trial habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-bias plea-waiver procedural-fairness standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference: 2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was judge bias in raising affirmative defense

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | (4) | (1). WAS JUDGE STEVEN BOUGH BIAS FOR RATSIMG 4 ATFIREMTIVE DEFENSE _ FOR THE DEPENSE WEEN THE GOVERNMENT DIS NOT RAISE THIS DEFENSE OR IT DID NOT APPLY. (2) .DEB MR.GREGORY RECIEVE A FAIR 28 USC 2255 BU UNBIAS JUDGE. ( 48) (2). DID THE PEDEREAL DISTRICT COURT AND APPEALLANT COURT VIOLATE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS BY FAILING TO INQUIRE INTO HIS CONFLICT OF ENTEREST WITH HIS ATTORNEYS. . (434 WAS MR.GREGORY DENIED: BUEsPRCCESS RIGHTS TO COUNSEL BY HIS ATTORNEY ' ADBANDOMENT DURING HIS HEARING TO WITHDRAW GUILTY PLEA‘ . (5) DID THE APPEALLANT COURT DENEY MR.GREGORY COUNSEL DURING HIS DERERECT APPEAL. (6) (6) WAS WR.GREGORY DENIES A TATR Q253 PROCEEDINGS BY NOT BEING GRANTED A EVIDENARY HEARING. { (7) (7). WAS JUDCE BOUGH ALLGW 10 DENY MR.GREGORY A CHANCE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF., (8).COULD JUDGE STEVEN BOUGH ENFORNCE A PLEA WAIVER WHEN THE APPEALLANT COURT ASSUME IN THE DERECT APPEAL IT DID NOT APPLY. (9). DID THE COURT VICLATE MR.CREGORY'S RIGHTS BY VIOLATING THE PLEA 4

Docket Entries

2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 18, 2024)

Attorneys

Bryan Lee Gregory
Bryan Lee Gregory — Petitioner
Bryan Lee Gregory — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent