No. 23-7032
Bryan Lee Gregory v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-144 28-usc-455 appellate-review civil-procedure due-process judicial-bias judicial-procedure petition-renaming recusal rule-60-b standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was judge allowed to rename petition
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1 ST QUESTION WAS JUDGE STEVEN BOUGH ALLOW TO RENAME MR.GREGORY'S 28 USCS 144 PETITION AS A 28 USCS 455 PETITION? 2ND QUESTION | WAS MR.GREGORY DENIED HIS FUNDIMNETAL DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN HIS RULE 60-B, PURSUANT TC 28 USC 455 (b) (5) (iii) ? . 3RD QUESTION DID MR.GREGORY SUFFER BIAS IN HIS APPEAL OF HIS RULE S5C-B BY APPEALLANT JUDGE STRUS BEING ON THE JUDGE PANEL OF MR.GREGORYS APPEAL OF HIS RULE 60 (b)? 4th QUESTION: WAS JUDGE STEVEN BOUGH REQUIRED TO ACCEPTS THE FACTS AS BEING TRUE IN MR GREGORY's 28 USCS 144 PETITION THAT HE FILED IN HIS RULE_60 (6) PETITION 2? | 5
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 18, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent