No. 23-7034

Michael Carter v. Megan Hayes, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process government-employee judicial-misconduct judicial-proceeding qualified-immunity sovereign-immunity witness-immunity
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in dismissing petitioner's 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights claim on the basis of sovereign immunity

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : i E; leg hold Paloasion ab Ficec Haye Ne Probected by Ahioluke imaunctys | Petitioner AaSwem Mo. E 2 pe Prolcdien dePactment he Qrotected hy Sovereign jmmunrty® | felibionec Daswece Nod. : (Groudulact | Ui Eul misCondect to misled vag the Cosct ina \udicial Oraceediing @ fm ployee, Violates 1 Do dtionec AnSudese. Keo, A te gua ake Lendimuing Vinodica deeded! apply because 20s the Chick dit; lece eS. pSbituticnel Volatioo? | etitiener GuSulece Me, | | Partie: : UG. Meagan Have O Hole 16n BEFi¢e ta Ada. aunt O Cate | | | | “Tals hs Hable of Authecty Howe: ions Below 5 iL ookliets Lith DeciSinns oF Other Camcd§ e193, isu | Decision Of the SupesiocCouc=B oo =| ort A= Deuce and OiCohol evaluation atbacled | . _ | acta Fy. re-rald ZU RDO C1932. : _— — | iewta faeilic Tadusdey, 362 63d (571122) _ . | 42 SAL 9550 , 9545, $540 and 35u9. __ 3 | Nouris Vi County oF Bue ks 2ol US, Dist Lexis 9299(£ 0. PA loa ¥ . Pedit V. Mamie 43! Add Tm, 206) Pa. Caoertus Nexis VIPs. Commu. 105) pencec Ve Uniked Shated IS ALT R Id (ROA Inpe-192/ 2667-15 is __ IF Ser Ve Rodrige Me (4S. 476, Son (19 __ te | . © @ | Fer Opinion Delivered Ta the Courts Below | uct ar Cammoen Oleas oe Middle Diabet , Bas Sylvania, Der 10 Dapendiy A. The diskiet Couct’s date 4-4-1022. | dismissal af tae 22 LLS.C, 1982 Civilacdian ig ceQerduaced in | | | . rs | = 4 . ee | lL iwas ens =6° 1023. Oa selec denying Pedition foc ceheariag UraS ealered. ; oe fo ONS Anta) Prod eareutoy me Proves, ia. [ avalved : ; ; i : () . . . HoJ2emaO ls Fil Vers.cu hacnac N24 ‘2 Ad io the United Skee Lid Dubie Q ~ vpe . = i ¢ ARISeLuie tong there ok, ve. en $_ Or th Ao tes. Steates anda Ch ates i if . <o . ps ‘ye im . Hiibcidee The i) dae Oc 19M wities OF Citizens OF the atked Slabess Nor i . ti or . . ic . . . HNonalhi Gwar te te Cun SOMO) es joe.ent Cx OF6 O24 p isch Pel ronQ CALA Ye, . en. 2 Amendmerct is en Eaceed by) Title 42, Seeion 1993, Unidel Slotes Cader Ue Vers DexSen Uno sldnde alor Ae An teat ude. card aentég reduleshiaia 2Stnm. A ~ AS25208 Bord) Stade 3 2 Fai teen 2 ze. Diskeiet AE Coltumbi Dc Si Cab Se, Dloe Sith Q@ny CitiZen Ok the. United Skkes ar other JecSen urithin the HAC Sd GA INO PONE deca ten OF AY Sant, | 2g2S fre innMsnities Secured. j 2 . . 7 . ‘ . i} . . | Rr iit 1a Cou), Or other Ocahect Ire zeding Fax vedress, eXee0t that in aay | i . . Loe -. =< tree . e WAC+tiAan lorrusaelst Bae ine Ach al 2) 2 “y bin ACL RO ‘oll on & Kei nid lait * . j > . + ; a lac roe’s tudizial CaPecidy, ia wintdive relicE Shall nat he Zoioked ualess A. clecla ratory — HACC ree. (AIG QlAteA AC ACHO CY EAC ities lLinever late ae») P3529 2 Fe : ettionn, ON 34 OC) Ong re 290lrae ble x iM othe iSki ct A COlamMia. i headl he. ConSidevedte het. Shitute BE the Dicheiet OF Columigia 8 | G) | : nis, C2Se (i529 Gg on Ot jnderiredehion oO he Due Preess Clause | E the Fucteenth Dmeadeneat do the United Yades Conthtudian The dishiod — HC th aciteictiom Under the CRN See" clévend Aires (oa died rx Gre ck, | 20.) AB A fe -—— Sj eeeSeSFSSSsSe | O ; A840 Relied won Fac Allourance, oF Dope { ; Geass 4 [P Con Eli th decisi Cole. aod Paloation af Fels and enplyees like, PaSeculocs aud ppt ce plat ft eae el faba dncig Tg — [Pets pinay am adminishabise Cexeeutive Functions ard iavestiaasting aad jnchading revetahan DeceediagS < Couck's (tase For uisabiog tadisenss this Cvilackon ig _ eteuse Prolantian petite Hayes (6 onrbecded by absrlute witness immunity, OS Shs: _Hinas afiering testiovay in the CatercteEa yudieval prosetdias, cMudle V.Teanetts.. (1983), ‘unchiond Executive celading to the eafnecement oF \auwiand the Canduct s€allairs, es prcitive Fuednugs, Btitionee ies Darel alec aerest and oathe wnydethes been ts re bab let me Send you to tehab, Biter long Consideacion the. Debihane Oroe eédiin « . i ; @ ®@ During the greaceding INS. Hayes bad Not Said anything coast the eualuadiina So the ——___-Pehttioner told his huyecand the lowyechoid the \udge about He evaluation. Then Whe

Docket Entries

2024-09-06
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-08-15
DISTRIBUTED.
2024-06-10
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2024.
2024-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 19, 2024)

Attorneys

Michael Carter
Michael Carter — Petitioner
Michael Carter — Petitioner