Whether the petitioner has met the burden of proof to establish his mental incompetence and entitlement to a competency hearing

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; TeTivlener has been ralsing the issue of Als dtntatslied) Menval capacity Smee prev tal, Howevet hts Vere covagel and lower COUIYS S¥are That the Portriyae has 70 me¥ bly buchen of prot, Veter Yo verel, ¥trieaer Fed) bs Tord counsel, Yaar he ts “borelesIme ce¥anled “ Wal counsel even cont rmech ¥hs SMereny In his affidauir and alo acknowledged thar the Yerivtoner exhibiys ad hn indshed capaclry in vadlersrandiug, The record alse pellects Yhay-The Pevittoaer has almost no vadecHanding of usher wos Taleing place aT Teel, . Nermeser a ahseeh «oh of melhor Ne. 43318¥ance of course . agaMaT his Forel counsel Lh 00 requesting 4 comberenty hea after vorbignal ereited Mts mental Zrare 5 hier, Perit. ay now's re Me News ood hes cvgts and) locks the whan. Mg Yo even comprehend Yheut. TH toner weal) hed) mex the Proponderarce of end tnee. Sanders Ceguired Vo rteve le Cous~ 10 onder a CompenTancy hear ng levalua¥ ten, Bux Tel Coyasef tely FeriTeer dD nex meer the “MaANY” CVerte per weole) 1 hed beaed¥2) hrs Joke, MecT mg Yhe eguiverenté Fo 47g ve More a war % Prve, espedl My bra iy Aaberged Melgety— ruling s + Ls vhere a consensus amongsr Tul counsels where hey gee 45 Fo whar !s “Sulbte hear" when desertbhay Yhen cheats”. a Hiry % consol with Them? Nad IS There a s ther Ita €or counsels 7) wherher er net — hieer has a “tartonal ohgtes! op onder svandh. pee te 4s HW vhese standards vary from ore lauyer'es anéther, Yhis belief corses The Issue hare ‘E ForiTtener bed 2 ottered? covasel, her mdweovel ual) ted rove) Ye Cons Ve oder an evabvaties.