Whether the lower appellate court misapprehends appealability and/or overlooks the request and denial in the district court for certification of appeal and motion for stay pending appeal of denial of substantial rights incapable of vindication on appeal

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the lower appellate court misapprehends appealability and/or overlooks the request and denial in the district court for certification of appeal and motion for stay pending appeal of denial of substantial rights incapable of ; vindication on appeal. 2. Whether denial of the substantial right of de novo determination by Article til Judicial Officer without Report and Recommendation (R&R) on dispositive matters, hereafter coerced R&R, impermissibly denies/diminishes substantial rights without consent including but not limited to, appeal by and through the conflicted district court judge, diminished standard of review with R&R, denial of full and fair judicial review, and/or diminished time to file objections/appeal of R&R with potential loss of full, fair, and meaningful review if deemed untimely by the conflicted overworked and underpaid district court judge. 3. Whether a reasonable person reasonably questions the neutrality of the overworked and underpaid district court judge on appeal of coerced Report & Recommendation (R&R) without consent after denial of a citizen’s motion for the substantial right of de novo determination by Article Ill Judicial Officer without R&R on dispositive matters. 4. Whether the record reflects lack of factual support for wrongful dismissal, abuse of discretion by the conflicted overworked and underpaid district court judge, and/or grounds for disqualification of the conflicted district court judge.