Carol Ann McBratnie v. Charles Paul Rettig, et al.
AdministrativeLaw ERISA DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Question not identified
questions presented are: . @ What does the jurisdictional checkbox on Tax Court Form 2 represent ? Is it restricted to 26 USC §7436 and businesses only, or do workers such as McBratnie and Mrs. Harrold-Jones have jurisdiction ? Mrs. Harrold-Jones and McBratnie received different USTC treatment in checking this box. ; e Did the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit err in dismissal of the entire Complaint and Preliminary Injunction, by failure to address any of the “actual facts and claims” as presented in the Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction ? e Is Gross Negligence adequately understood to be: the IRS policy actions/inactions by: pre: assigned taxation; and post: failure to remove assigned taxation; in between: absent communications on the SS-8 itself, which circumvented Judicial Due Process; such that it matters not whether the SS-8 was processed, but whether its’ status was communicated ? : ¢ Is McBratnie’s FTCA Gross Negligence Claim fully established for resolution ? ii e Did the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit err by dismissal of the entire Complaint failing to correctly comprehend or address the Fraud on the US Tax Court ? e Was McBratnie’s: “official capacity” side (not the damages side) of the USTC Fraud on the Court fully established for resolution ? e Are processing of Administrative Remedies of the IRS mandatory where taxation is assigned and not removed ? Processing includes communication of intentions. e If Administrative Remedies remain unprocessed past the statute of limitations for any Agency, should not the citizen’s assertion be deemed correct due to Abdication of Procedural Due Process ? e@ Can the IRS compartmentalize a tax year's taxation debt ? e Can the Federal Government refuse to provide service addresses of individual capacity Federal Workers, after being Placed on Notice of needing such, and themselves thereafter, Motion to dismiss a Complaint’s Claims against the individual capacity Federal Workers, due to insufficient service or insufficient service of process ? The US Supreme Court has become the Court of last resort for supervisory powers. Re: e Fraud on the Courts, particularly by the Appeals Court dismissing an entire Complaint on facts / claims different than those in the Complaint e@ The Constitutionality of select statutes: 28 USC §2680(c) and 26 USC §7436 e@ The Constitutionality of the Federal Payment Levy Program of the IRS, that turns the USTC Docket into a hiring “Black-List”. ; e@ The Constitutionality of IRS handling of Administrative Remedies