No. 23-7049
Daniel Arsenio Rodgers v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: crime-lab criminal-procedure enhancement evidence-interpretation firearms naked-eye sentencing-guidelines serial-number visible
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in applying a four-level enhancement under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines for 'altered or obliterated' serial number, where the serial number was 'visible to the naked eye' and required no crime lab procedure to read the serial number
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I Whether the district court erred in applying a four-level enhancement under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines for “altered or obliterated” serial number, where the serial number was “visible to the naked eye” and required no crime lab procedure to read the serial number. i
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2024)
Attorneys
Daniel Arsenio Rodgers
David Edmund Mullin — MULLIN & LAVERTY, PC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent