James L. Miller v. Scott S. Harris, Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States
AdministrativeLaw
Whether the government's denial of a patent application for a new invention violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment
No question identified. : A WITTER STATES _ 3 ___ PET TioW FOR AWRIT OF LERTIMAL 51 Orden tdiialde i 8 bh Ket (Anek.) ¥ex4 530, 1 Appendh-L, 03 3b,7 89, 2 lin! 1 Bock ext ~ 44, i Hope Wi-L. 03,39. oC, bathe 1X 7 ome in fippe. Mix Lp 1A ety i Ie, oxt 59 ab 201 18-0 FQ09G=-PSJPR, thy, Dock ex? b-15, fn Anpeddix| . Blut 3 Fed) Mig tf — Cis! Bathe 80 WajFPQ"93-C Ur 199 41 AB-FS. ell “Sevengl Aelone” 408 “Submitted "with “abd . 271 Uk 50 e Col A Ape MADRAS; be 1ST Hop orld Xe i f3,2h 281 53,9 COR Aol 14+ BOSE) = 1-15. Spy Bopadite 1. Ph S4,Sb, é . . 7 | ) THE SWMENE CouRT 7 COB, dye /256562 -—L.1, hy Aopen XL 08, 529 21 monte” of the Petition) For a Wary ab bortianarl Buon oF : 8 a7 7/0} i I?) wt IS-I, 3° 3 up tt (4b 00 2 Sum Met Ar ML 5518 Baan py 20-5903" Sion, Wh? nQ535%. YL” al BT tgtee! oe "@aMau!t vet tation with a. “Ary” whith wes | 6} nlo dewted by Sat 8, Hants. Le Chek, | 2 usually “prone (7) A” upon 6 Change of govervnel? tre Punoas 271 5% F.2d ae A Pohul? ated Apesad, [tho AV Wa), Alo (2 } \ ; , | : of"