Whether the district court erroneously instructed the jury concerning the Section 924(c) charges?

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. | WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRONEOUSLY INSTRUCTED THE JURY CONCERNING THE SECTION 924(c) CHARGES? Il | WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT ESTABLISHED A KNOWING VIOLATION OF TITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 924(g)(3) (BEING AN UNLAWFUL USER OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE WHILE KNOWINGLY POSSESSING A FIREARM)? i I. INTERESTED PARTIES Counsel for the Petitioner, Breon Hicks, certifies that the following persons and entities have or may have an interest in the outcome of this case: 2. Honorable Dave Lee Brannon, U.S. Magistrate Judge; 3. Jack Fleischman, Esq., Defense Counsel; 4. Brandy Gellar, Assistant U.S. Attorney; 5. Breon D. Hicks, Petitioner; 6. Markenzy Lapointe, U.S. Attorney ~ Southern District of Florida; ie Nicole D. Mariani, Assistant U.S. Attorney; 8. Honorable William Mattewman, U.S. Magistrate Judge; 9. John McMillan, Assistant U.S. Attorney; 10. Honorable Bruce E. Reinhart, U.S. Magistrate Judge; 11. Richard L. Rosenbaum, Esq., Counsel for Petitioner; 12. Honorable Robin L. Rosenberg, U.S. District Judge; 13, Lisa Tobin Rubio, Assistant U.S. Attorney; 14. William T. Zloch, Assistant U.S. Attorney; No publicly traded company or corporation has an interest in the outcome of this appeal. ii