No. 23-7093

Jeremy J. Quinn, Jr. v. Ohio

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2024-03-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process eighth-amendment sentencing sentencing-statute state-courts
Key Terms:
Takings
Latest Conference: 2024-10-11 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a state court's imposition of a criminal sentence that violates the defendant's due process rights and constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the 14th and 8th Amendments

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions) Presented ee ) Lonen a State Court Carelessly or deliberately Mcakes a Ralse Claim: To enhanse & erimina| Sentence, oes it violate a person (Due Process Nahts and Constitute as crue! and Unugua{ Punishment Under the I4¥thand 8) US. Consh'utona| Amendment, 2) when a criminal Sentence violates it's own Shubes Sentencing Statue and Structure, ma Birr it Contrary to Law, Yety Hhe state courts rR 45 Conve i+, Does it violatea persen Due Orocess Rights, constituting as wellas crue | and Unusual Punishment dander the 14% and §™% ‘\mendment, ) 3) When a 70 year prison sentence that cumulative, . 16 60 arossly disaproptianate to the o\Sence commited and other similaC crimes, 7 a point its Extreme and Rate. Does it raises tothe Level of Cruel and unusua! punishment,

Docket Entries

2024-10-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-05-23
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-10
Waiver of right of respondent Ohio to respond filed.
2024-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2024)

Attorneys

Jeremy J. Quinn
Jeremy J. Quinn Jr. — Petitioner
Ohio
Brenda J. Skinkiss MajdalaniJulia R. Bates, Lucas County Prosecutor, Respondent