No. 23-7093

Jeremy J. Quinn, Jr. v. Ohio

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2024-03-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process eighth-amendment sentencing sentencing-statute state-courts
Latest Conference: 2024-10-11 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

When a state court carelessly or negligently enters a cause claim, to enhance a criminal sentence, does it violate a person's due process rights and constitute as cruel and unusual punishment under the 8th and 14th U.S. Constitutional amendments?

When a state's sentencing statute and structure is kind contrary to law, yet the state courts cause to correct it, does it violate a person's due process rights, constituting as unlawful cruel and unusual punishment under the 8th and 14th amendments? Criminal sentence violates C's order.

When a 70 year prison sentence that cumulatively is so grossly disproportionate to the offense committed and other similar crimes, to a point its extreme and rare, does it raise to the level of cruel and unusual punishment?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a state court's imposition of a criminal sentence that violates the defendant's due process rights and constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the 14th and 8th Amendments

Docket Entries

2024-10-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-05-23
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-10
Waiver of right of respondent Ohio to respond filed.
2024-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2024)

Attorneys

Jeremy J. Quinn
Jeremy J. Quinn Jr. — Petitioner
Ohio
Brenda J. Skinkiss MajdalaniJulia R. Bates, Lucas County Prosecutor, Respondent