No. 23-7094
IFP
Tags: administrative-agency administrative-extension criminal-sentencing due-process incarceration incarceration-findings jury-trial post-conviction sentencing sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of a right to trial by jury allow prison administrators to use their own post-conviction factual findings as the basis for affirmatively extending a defendant's incarceration?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of a right to trial by jury allow prison administrators to use their own post-conviction factual findings as the basis for affirmatively extending a defendant’s incarceration?
Docket Entries
2024-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2024.
2024-05-13
Reply of petitioner Tyshawn Shepard filed. (Distributed)
2024-04-29
Brief of respondent Ohio in opposition filed.
2024-03-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2024)
2024-01-22
Application (23A665) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until March 24, 2024.
2024-01-04
Application (23A665) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 24, 2024 to March 24, 2024, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Ohio
Daniel Tuyen Van — Cuyahoga County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent
Tyshawn Shepard