No. 23-7096

Ethel Oyekunle-Bubu v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: circuit-split controlled-substances criminal-law medical-practice medical-practitioner prescription-standards professional-practice professional-standards ruan-v-united-states statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fifth Circuit failed to follow Ruan v. United States by holding that a registered medical practitioner or pharmacist can be convicted for knowing prescriptions were issued for an illegitimate purpose or knowing they were dispensed outside the usual course of professional practice

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether Fifth Circuit’s gas failed to follow this Court’s decision in Ruan v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 2370 (2022) by holding that a registered medical practitioner or pharmacist charged under 21 U.S.C. §841 “can be convicted either for knowing prescriptions were issued for an illegitimate purpose or knowing they were dispensed outside the usual course of professional practice” and created a Circuit Split in so interpreting Ruan.

Docket Entries

2024-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-04-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2024)
2024-01-31
Application (23A704) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until March 26, 2024.
2024-01-26
Application (23A704) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 25, 2024 to April 25, 2024, submitted to Justice Alito.

Attorneys

Ethel Oyekunle-Bubu
Beau B. BrindleyThe Law Offices of Beau B. Brindley, Petitioner
Beau B. BrindleyThe Law Offices of Beau B. Brindley, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent