No. 23-7097

Travis C. Crosby v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conspiracy criminal-evidence criminal-procedure due-process eleventh-circuit evidence fraud fraud-charges ppp-loans relevant-conduct rule-404b sentencing
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in admitting Rule 404(b) evidence of unrelated PPP loan fraud,

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED , (1) Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in finding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting Rule 404 (b) evidence of fraudulent PPP loan activity regarding separate conspiracies unrelated to the conspiracy with which Petitioner was charged? (2) Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in finding that the district court did not err in holding Petitioner accountable for the PPP loans of Keith Maloney and Mark Stewart when there was insufficient evidence that Petitioner recruited them and reasonably . foresaw that their loans would be fraudulent, and the District Court failed to state the basis for finding their loans to be relevant conduct? ii

Docket Entries

2024-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-04-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2024)

Attorneys

Travis C. Crosby
Travis C. Crosby — Petitioner
Travis C. Crosby — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent