whether-vermont-civil-procedure-rules-were-properly-applied

Questions Presented The first question is toward a Rules of Civil Procedure of Vermonts own 8{a){1}, petitioner was prompted by the Newfane-Windham Court Civil Division to provide a short plain statement to accompany claim, placed in the docket entry as a Request for Amendment with the Claim which led to detraction of the entire case despite placement for clarification, correction of Statute cited in complaint, and a direct statement upon Motion to Reconsider to the Vermont Supreme Court. I believe the matter was improperly denied joinder or consolidation upon request with other cases to include matter 23-CV-02764 appealed from WindhamNewfane Civil Unit to the Vermont Supreme Court as 23-AP-392 citing common law Negligence particularly to each matter in policing by Brattleboro Town Police Department and for efficiency. The final question here is whether the complaint made to the Braitlebord | Police Communication Committee actually did investigate the complaint. No handwritten response, or much else is verified. i