May federal judges reframe and distort Petitioner's arguments?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; May federal judges reframe and distort Petitioner’s arguments so they can knock them down and dismiss her case? May federal judges ensnare Petitioner in a fabricated procedural trap that allows . them to dismiss her case, deprive her of justice, and set her up to die? May federal judges refuse to save the life of a pro se litigant by providing prompt relief or partial relief that is relatively simple to provide and legally justifiable? May federal judges deny Petitioner justice because they feel insulted that she sought prompt resolution and partial compensation in advance, as the IRS admitted it had mistreated/abused her and the advance payment would allow her to stay alive? May federal judges deny Petitioner justice because they feel insulted that she argued that the District Court Judge’s decisions constituted ethical lapses? May federal judges purposefully violate the law by employing unsound reasoning to affirm the District Court decision and reinforce ethical lapses? May federal judges ignore Petitioner’s claims, not ruling on them, and allow the IRS to keep on defrauding the public and abusing/mistreating taxpayers? May federal judges reinforce discrimination and other prejudices? May federal judges freely violate the law, the Code of Conduct for United States ; Judges, the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct, and their oath of office? ii