No. 23-7118

Danilo Augusto Feliciano, aka Danil Ezekiel Faust v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2024-04-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law agency-discretion arbitrary-and-capricious civil-procedure constitutional-analysis due-process judicial-review legal-interpretation precedent-setting statutory-construction
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Privacy
Latest Conference: 2024-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can an agency decision not to enforce a law despite notification of a longstanding, persistent violation of the law that has been publicly admitted to, be deemed as 'arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise not in accordance with law' under 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A)?

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : |. Can an agendas Is aeoision nok ty Act despite notifiastion of A Shearjongeing, ore persistent Violation of the. lau) hat as been pubbiay admitted to, be deemed as “arbitrary, dapriai ah . or otherwie not jn Jiooante ‘oth wre ey distreti dedartbed mw 5 US.4, § Foe C2CAY? 2, Is an Agendy deaision not to enforce 6 Aue ; " Vqhta a dleavy on bing and pester V10 ror ~eviewalle ja the Soave of a alesterd. 5 Connincinia! / dongressioral wateit ty the contrary ‘ 4 la there Gill & rin for relief wider the Tealacatery Si udaomatt Aok, 28 USC, % 220\ when there has beer aharm i the. ant oy 2 atten’ Vote to be dow ted, by an aaendys refusal to Sort —

Docket Entries

2024-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2024.
2024-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent Garland, Merrick B. to respond filed.
2024-02-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2024)

Attorneys

Danilo A. Feliciano
Danilo A. Feliciano — Petitioner
Danilo A. Feliciano — Petitioner
Garland, Merrick B.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent