Danilo Augusto Feliciano, aka Danil Ezekiel Faust v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
AdministrativeLaw Privacy
Can an agency decision not to enforce a law despite notification of a longstanding, persistent violation of the law that has been publicly admitted to, be deemed as 'arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise not in accordance with law' under 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A)?
No question identified. : |. Can an agendas Is aeoision nok ty Act despite notifiastion of A Shearjongeing, ore persistent Violation of the. lau) hat as been pubbiay admitted to, be deemed as “arbitrary, dapriai ah . or otherwie not jn Jiooante ‘oth wre ey distreti dedartbed mw 5 US.4, § Foe C2CAY? 2, Is an Agendy deaision not to enforce 6 Aue ; " Vqhta a dleavy on bing and pester V10 ror ~eviewalle ja the Soave of a alesterd. 5 Connincinia! / dongressioral wateit ty the contrary ‘ 4 la there Gill & rin for relief wider the Tealacatery Si udaomatt Aok, 28 USC, % 220\ when there has beer aharm i the. ant oy 2 atten’ Vote to be dow ted, by an aaendys refusal to Sort —