No. 23-7128
Harvey Windsor v. Steven T. Marshall, Attorney General of Alabama, et al.
IFP
Tags: accomplice-liability capital-murder certificate-of-appealability death-penalty discovery-limitation habeas-corpus head-injury ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel postconviction-relief
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, when both the state trial court and the federal
district court agree that a habeas petitioner has pleaded a claim
that, if true, would warrant relief and when reasonable jurists could
debate whether the district court erred in limiting discovery, a
Court of Appeals should issue a Certificate of Appealability.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a habeas petitioner is entitled to a certificate of appealability when the state trial court and federal district court agree that the petitioner has pleaded a claim that, if true, would warrant relief, and reasonable jurists could debate whether the district court erred in limiting discovery
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-03
Brief of respondent Steven T. Marshall, Attorney General of Alabama, et al. in opposition filed.
2024-04-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 3, 2024. See Rule 30.1.
2024-04-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 2, 2024 to June 2, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-03-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 2, 2024)
2024-02-16
Application (23A756) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until March 28, 2024.
2024-02-14
Application (23A756) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 27, 2024 to March 28, 2024, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Steven T. Marshall, Attorney General of Alabama, et al.
Henry Mitchell Johnson — Alabama Atty General, Respondent