Can an Appeals Court Panel 'accidentally' miss/not rule on a second appealed/argued Order, and then just ignore that second argued Order, even when repeatedly asked about it?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED TAKING THE HIGH ROAD: My Appeals Panel of 3 Circuit Judges accidentally missed that the District Court Judge had issued 2 Orders, each on different legal grounds, in ruling for my 11 defendants, who had split themselves into 2 groups, by filing 2 different Motions to Dismiss, to my very different sets of allegations; and my Panel accidentally missed that those 2 Orders were appealed, and argued on Appeal, by both sides; so my Panel accidentally issued an Order that only Affirmed Dismissal for the 1 Order/Group of 10 defendants. Noting, my Panel’s 2 sentence Order Affirming the 1 Order/Group was by legal reasoning that does not and can not apply to the 2": Order/Group of 1 defendant. QUESTION: Can an a Appeals Court Panel “accidentally” miss/not rule on the 2" appealed/argued on Appeal Order, and then just ignore that 2™ argued on Appeal Order, even when repeatedly asked about it (see Apndx E1-6)? ALTERNATE QUESTION: Can a Circuit Court Panel refuse to rule on an appealed/argued on Appeal Order, for whatever reason they chose? Without explanation? (See why they may now be refusing to rule at REASONS FOR GRANTING THIS PETITION, Section IV, page 11). iv. ,