No. 23-7133
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: acceptance-of-responsibility appellate-review criminal-appeal criminal-sentencing due-process fourth-circuit sentencing-discretion sentencing-guidelines statutory-maximum
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourth Circuit erred when determining that Petitioner's Sentence which exceeded the statutory maximum was proper and reasonable
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred when determining that Petitioner's Sentence which exceeded the statutory maximum was proper and reasonable 2. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred when determining that Petitioner was not entitled to any reduction for acceptance of responsibility e -i. oo en ssn nec eee eee eee p202/p0/E0 LIST OF ALL PARTIES Garry Hines is the Petitioner / Defendant in this matter United States of America is the respondent in this matter . -1i pZ02/70/E€0
Docket Entries
2024-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-04-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 3, 2024)
Attorneys
Garry Hines
Garry Hines — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent