No. 23-7138

Luis Alexis Briceno v. Tennessee

Lower Court: Tennessee
Docketed: 2024-04-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: ake-v-oklahoma constitutional-rights due-process expert-assistance federal-due-process indigent-defendants indigent-defense judicial-review procedural-fairness tennessee-court-of-appeals
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2024-05-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Tennessee's procedure for denying indigent defendants funding for expert assistance at trial violates due process

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Tennessee’s procedure for denying indigent defendants funding for expert assistance at trial violates due process because a trial court’s order that experts services are constitutionally necessary can be administratively denied and that denial is subject to review only by the Chief Justice of the Tennessee Supreme Court in a closed proceeding without the defendant’s involvement, without any published standards of review, and without providing any explanation for overruling the trial court? ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS 1. State v. Briceno, Case No. 115160 (Knox County, Tenn. Crim. Ct. Mar. 4 2022). 2. State v. Briceno, No. (Tenn. Dec. 01, 2022) (Order denying motion for TN Sup. Ct. to assume jurisdiction of case pending in lower appellate court). 3. State v. Briceno, No. 2023 WL 4698 (Tenn. Crim. App. July 11, 2023). 4. State v. Briceno, No. (Tenn. Nov. 17, 2023). iii

Docket Entries

2024-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-04-25
Waiver of right of respondent Tennessee to respond filed.
2024-04-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 6, 2024)
2024-02-12
Application (23A742) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until April 1, 2024.
2024-02-05
Application (23A742) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 15, 2024 to April 1, 2024, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Luis Alexis Briceno
Tyler Mark CavinessLaw Office of Tyler M. Caviness, Petitioner
Tyler Mark CavinessLaw Office of Tyler M. Caviness, Petitioner
Tennessee
Katherine Casseley ReddingOffice of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent
Katherine Casseley ReddingOffice of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent