Did the named officers of the court perpetrate fraud to conceal petitioner's patent rights?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. In 2006 onto 2008, did the named officers of the court in the district court jointly perpetrate fraud on the court to conceal petitioner Franklin’s desert land patent rights evidence from pretrial discovery evidence for trial, to obtain their permanent injunction order against Franklin’s patent rights that is 100% concealed in their court order ECF No. 111, and from all court orders and judgments of record? 2. Does the newly discovered evidence and its compelling interrogatory questions served to (“BWD LLCs”) lead attorney Urga in March 2021, prima facie prove that the named “officers of the court” defrauded the U.S. out of its 80 acre land patent, while knowing, yet “concealing” it from all court record that Franklin had and holds the desert land patent rights on his entered 80 acre estate, under the longstanding land patent law of this Court in Stockley v. United States, 260 U.S. 532 (1923). 3. On 07/19/2023, did the 9th Circuit Court panel recite the Trensettah case that again “omitted” the remaining part in such citation, that fraud “perpetrated by ‘officers of the court’ so that the judicial machinery cannot perform in a usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication.” is precisely the “high standard” of “fraud on the court” for appellate court review and Stockley patent relief? i LIST OF ALL PARTIES All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all