No. 23-7145
Richard Dewayne Lewis v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3583 appellate-review circuit-split extra-statutory-factors revocation-sentences sentencing sentencing-review standard-of-review statutory-interpretation supervised-release
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Proper-standard-of-review-for-supervised-release-revocation-sentences
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED L What is the proper standard of review for evaluating supervised release revocation sentences on appeal? I. May a district court imposing sentence on a revocation of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) consider extra-statutory or omitted factors such as the need for just punishment, to reflect the seriousness of the offense, or to promote respect for the law?
Docket Entries
2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-04-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 6, 2024)
Attorneys
Richard Lewis, et al.
Joseph Stephen Camden — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent