Robert M. Greene v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
ERISA
Whether Florida's suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus violates Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; . Question One 4 WHETHER FLORIDA'S SuSPENSton OF THE PRIVILEGE OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ViOLATES ARTICLE |, S&TION 4, OF THE UNITED STATES CeNsTITUTion £ Question Tuso % WHETHER FLORIDAS SUSPENSION OF THE PRIVILEGE OF THE WRIT OF HABENS CORPUS NOT INCASES OF REBELLLON OR DNV ASIAN IN THE INTREST OR REQUIREMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, A GREAT Pubic INTREST ? Question Three * whether FioRibA's SUSPENSION OF THE PRIVILEGE OF TRE WRIT OF HABEAS CoRPUs WOT IAL CASES BF REBELLION OR IAIVASION, GUT INCASE LAWS , ADOPTED TO ABRIDGE THAT PRINLEGE 4 & VIOLATION OF AMENDMENT FOURTEEN , SECTION ONE, TOTHE LINITED STATES CONSTITUTION THAT EXPLICITLY PROHIBITS such Laws ? @uestion Four > : : WHETHER FLORIDA'S PRESUMING SPEEDY TRIAL VIOLATIoN CLAIMS RAISED (N A PETITION FoR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS To HAVE BEEN WAIVED BY INACTION TO RAISE THE CLAIM ON DIRECT APPEAL A WAIVER FORBIDDEN BY THE SUPREME CouRT OF THE UNITES STATES 2 Question Five? USKETHEA FLORIDA'S SUSPENSION OF THE PRIVILEGE OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CoRPUS FROM PETITIONERS SEEKIN G REMEDY FoR ILLEGAL IMPRISONMENT FROM CONSTITUTIONAL SPEEDY TRIAL VIOLATIONS DEWYING EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAWS ENACTED AND ADOPTED To ENFORCE THE RIGHT To A SPEEDY TRIAL JIN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW CLAUSE OF AMENDMENT 14, SEcrion |, To THE UTED STATES Constitution 2 Buestion dix f , | JP ANY OF THE ABeUE QUESTIONS ARE ANSWERD YES", SHoULDIWT THIS SUPREME COURI ORDER FLORIDA Te Gran THE WAIT ExH Bit A Denys to Do? 3./15 ;