Did the United States District Court magistrate err in denying the petitioners' 28 U.S.C. §2254 state habeas corpus petition without ruling on the merits of their state and federal constitutional violation claims?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . (1).DID The uni ted Stotes District court magistrate’for the Southern DIStictin ond foc MIAMI-DADE County: flor ida Efroc in denying the PelHonecs 23 U.S.C. Aa54 State habeos corpuS, without ruling on the merit of the Petitioners Stote ond Federal Constitutional Violation Claim. Pes» (a). DiD The uni ted States Court of APPeals for the Eleventn circuit Of GEOGIO, ClerK OF Court mofShall ECror in DiSMiSSing tre Petitioners “NOTIce OF APPeal, when the mogistate OF the united Stotes District couct for the Southern DiStrict in ond For MiAMiDADE . County, Florida magistrate ordered A TronSmi tol OF tre motice 40 the United States Courts oF APREAIS For the Eleventh circuit Court in hme For APPEllant (eviews P +++ (3). DID The united States District court magistrote for the Southern District in ond for MIAMI-DADE County, florida devioted or Errored By not ruling on the merit of A State ond federal Constitutiono! Vidlation Claim thot(1) (esulted ia A decision tnot wos contary 40,01 involved on UNreaSonoBle opplication OF Clearly estoBlished federal low os determined By the supreme court Of the United States of (8) (esulted in A deciSion that wos Bosed on on unreasonoBie Opplication or determination OF the facts in light OF the evidence Presented in the Stote court Proceedings __ Pursuant to Florida 38 U-S.C-AASUGMihond (ah. Peas ~fit |