Whether the Court of Appeals erred in categorically ruling that Mr. Barlow's two 2013 counts of conviction for Georgia aggravated assault constituted 'crimes of violence' under Application Note 1 of U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1 and U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the Court of Appeals err when it categorically ruled that Mr. Barlow’s two 2013 counts of conviction for Georgia aggravated assault constituted “crimes of violence” under Application Note | of U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1 and U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, where both the Supreme Court of Georgia and the Eleventh Circuit have repeatedly held Georgia aggravated assault can be committed recklessly under Mr. Barlow’s exact statute of conviction and where this Court has held “offenses with a mens rea of recklessness do not qualify as violent felonies”. Borden v. United States, 593 U.S. 420, 445 (2021).