No. 23-7191

Jay Lin v. Aaron Sayers

Lower Court: New Jersey
Docketed: 2024-04-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process forgery judicial-misconduct new-jersey-courts perjury perjury-allegation secret-law secretive-stipulation trial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Due-process-violation

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED New Jersey State Courts allow the practice a secret law of “Secretive Stipulation” to bind and against the underprivileged New Jersey citizen, a ; suspect of violation of the Due Process law of thé United State . ; Constitution. |? . , The questions presented are: ; 1. The Court should outlaw the New Jersey State Courts practices of allowing the New : Jersey trial court holding “Secretive Stipulation” with Defense attorney. 2. The New Jersey Courts erred in conducting an unlawful trial in this case, a violation ; of the Due Process law of the United States Constitutions. ; A. The New Jersey Courts allow the trial court ignored and attempted to shield Defendant’s attorney’s criminal acts of Perjury and Forgery. oo B. The New Jersey Trial Court entered Judgment without any testimonies, ; i witnesses, experts, records, reasons, arguments, facts, rules or laws but private, personal, secretive stipulation from the defense attorney from the trial. i t i t : 1 New Jersey State Constitution does not comfort New Jersey citizens the protection of the law of Due Process of the United State Constitution. : “The Supreme Court of New Jersey Advisory Committee of Judicial Conduct permits New ' Jersey Court Judges hold personal. private, and secretive Stipulation with the defense attorney.

Docket Entries

2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-04-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 10, 2024)

Attorneys

Jay Lin
Jay J. Lin — Petitioner
Jay J. Lin — Petitioner