Does the federal courts apply proper standards of review when examining lower court rulings on due process, free-speech, equal-protection, civil-procedure, standing, appeals

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1.) Does This Federal courts apply standards of review when examining lower court rulings. It refers to the idea of fundamental fairness, that the government must treat an individual according to rules and procedures. How due process ensures fairness and protects from governmental overreach? . 2.) Did Plaintiffs Appeal presents a question of law, that the State court violate Plaintiff 1st amendment right to redress a grievance by silencing and chilling his first amendment rights to file an Appeal pursuant to federal rule 4 and did the State Court also violate Plaintiffs 14th Amendment right of equal protection and due process, by not allowing Plaintiff the right to Appeal after Arizona rule of civil Procedure 54(c) was entered by the state court? 3.) Applying FRCP 54 (b) Did Plaintiff Appeal presents a federal questions of fact, that Plaintiff timely filed a notice of Appeal after the state court entered Arizona rule civil Procedure 54(c) final judgment. and 4.) Did Plaintiff Appeal presents matters of procedure Applying FRCP 54(b) pursuit to rule Arizona Civil Procedure 54(c) Appealing from final Judgment that violated and silenced and chilled Plaintiffs | Federal right to redress of grievance of the 1st amendment and violated Plaintiffs Due Process rights and equal protection of the 14th amendment 1) the due process clause may arise from a liberty interest form the due process clause itself or 2) from state law? And 5.) Did the State Court , violate their discretion rule by not allowing Plaintiff his liberty interest and right to Appeal after the | state court entered rule 54 (c) order of final judgment? 6.) Did the State Court violate their own ez Da | pos rule pursuant to rule 54 (c) by not allowing Plaintiff the right to appeal, after final judgment was entered by the Superior Court? (PARTIES TO PROCEEDING CEBONE LEROY EAST & CATHY MUNOZ, PLAINTIFFS (Foxit AUTO REPAIR, INC. et., al. DEFENDANTS (