No. 23-7205

Luke Joselin v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-04-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-deference circuit-split fraud fraud-loss intended-loss kisor-v-wilkie loss-calculation sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw
Latest Conference: 2024-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Commentary to the Fraud Loss Table U.S.S.G. §2B1.1(b), Note 3(A) Defining Loss as Including 'Intended Loss,' Should Be Given Deference After Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S.Ct. 2400, 2415 (2019)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Commentary to the Fraud Loss Table U.S.S.G. §2B1.1(b), Note 3(A) Defining Loss as Including “Intended Loss,” Should Be Given Deference After Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S.Ct. 2400, 2415 (2019). i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no

Docket Entries

2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2024-04-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 13, 2024)

Attorneys

Luke Joselin
Margaret Yvonne FoldesFederal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent