Whether the trial Court Committed reversible error in denying the defendant's request for jury instructions on self-defense and necessity, even though there was some evidence in the trial record of these affirmative defenses

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED ; ty Whether the trial Court Committed ‘reversible S! €rvor in denytry the deferkels request fr ) dury Wnstudons on SeledeR,s0 and Nea essity, even though there was Some Cutdence in dhe dital record of-dheso atBrmative defenses, eniifting Dexyne 2), Whether Dwadve Tay lo18 endtHed -to~a New Sentencing hearhng Where the Same Prtor Class K~-lony~ Convichon was Used +o both establish an element of the offense of armed habitual CrimMinas, and te qualify nm ir a WR Sentene under the | Improper double enhancement, | fey an