Whether the government's intentional interference with an alien's valid employment contract that results in the alien's indefinite homelessness is a taking

question presented is: 1. Whether the government intentional interference with an alien’s valid . employment contract that results in the alien’s indefinite homelessness is a taking. In other words, whether an alien’s valid employment contract with a foreign : : government is a protected property interest. Homeless individuals have the right to be represented by their own choice of | counsel at the government expense for a denial of public benefit. The question presented is: 2. Whether a homeless individual is entitled to an assignment of counsel and ~ injunctive reliefs to institute a taking claim for his appropriated employment — : contract. —