No. 23-7215

David Hueston v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-04-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-client-privilege evidentiary-weight fourth-amendment franks-hearing franks-v-delaware officer-affiant probable-cause prosecutorial-consultation prosecutorial-discretion search-and-seizure search-warrant
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference: 2024-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a reviewing court may place substantial evidentiary weight on an officer-affiant's consultation with a prosecuting attorney before seeking and obtaining a search warrant in determining whether a Franks violation occurred

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED In determining whether a Franks violation occurred, whether a reviewing court may place substantial evidentiary weight on an officer-affiant’s consultation with a prosecuting attorney before seeking and obtaining a search warrant? i

Docket Entries

2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-04-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 13, 2024)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

David Hueston
Chad Pennington — Northern District of Indiana Federal Community Def, Petitioner
Chad Pennington — Northern District of Indiana Federal Community Def, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent