No. 23-7221
Luke John Scott, Sr. v. United States
Tags: federal-law federal-perjury obstruction-of-justice perjury-rule sentencing-guidelines two-level-enhancement uncorroborated-testimony united-states
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2024-05-09
Related Cases:
23-7220
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the longstanding rule for federal perjury cases that a finding of perjury cannot rest on the uncorroborated testimony of one witness apply to the application of the two-level enhancement for obstruction of justice under the United States Sentencing Guidelines § 3C1.1, when the enhancement is based on perjury?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Does the longstanding rule for federal perjury cases that a finding of perjury cannot rest on the uncorroborated testimony of one witness apply to the application of the two-level enhancement for obstruction of justice under the United States Sentencing Guidelines § 3C1.1, when the enhancement is based on perjury? i
Docket Entries
2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2024)
Attorneys
Luke Scott, Sr.
Stephen R. Hormel — Hormel law Office, LLC, Petitioner
Stephen R. Hormel — Hormel law Office, LLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent