No. 23-7228

Jimmy D. Woods v. Arizona, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-04-15
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: article-iii civil-rights-damages due-process equal-protection federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-power subject-matter-jurisdiction supremacy-clause veterans-rights
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-05-16 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Article III jurisdiction extends to cases arising under the Constitution and federal law

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether under Article fll Sect. 2. The judicial Power extends to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under the Constitution, Laws: of the United States, and the United States government are a party. 2. Whether under Article XIV. Section 1.; petitioner’s rights of Due Process of Law and Equal Protections of the Laws were violated by state officials. 3. Whether Article VI. Clause 2., (Supremacy Clause) removes the possibility of all state action being taken in complete absence of all jurisdictions. 4. Whether petitioner has a right under Fed. Rules Civ. Proc. Rule 60(b)(4), when a court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, and parties, denied due process, therefore the issuing court's judgment is VOID. 5. Whether the petitioner rights under Article 1V Section 2. Section 3.2. Const. were denied by defendants prior to state court judgment. 6. Whether the petitioner's rights a (veteran) under (38 U.S.C. 5301(a), (38 U.S.C 511(a), does in fact jurisdictionally prohibit all state court orders (equitable or legal) and all such orders are preempted. 7. Whether 5" Amend. ruling of due process violations, Board of Veterans Appeals, should have also included deny equal protection under the laws. 8. Whether the petitioner is entitled to monetary damages for civil rights violation by state officials under 18 U.S.C. 241; 242, 245. (42 U.S.C. 1983) 9. Whether the petitioner is entitled to monetary damages under (42 U.S.C. 1983) claim for constitutional rights violations and federal law violations by federal officials acting along the side of state officers.

Docket Entries

2024-05-20
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2024-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-04-26
Waiver of right of respondent Arizona, et al. to respond filed.
2024-04-15
Motion (23M79) for leave to proceed as a veteran Denied.
2024-03-27
MOTION (23M79) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-02-12
Motion (23M79) for leave to proceed as a veteran filed.
2024-02-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2024)

Attorneys

Arizona, et al.
Jimmy Dale NielsenOffice of the Arizona Attorney General, Respondent
Jimmy Dale NielsenOffice of the Arizona Attorney General, Respondent
Jimmy Woods
Jimmy D. Woods — Petitioner
Jimmy D. Woods — Petitioner