Jimmy D. Woods v. Arizona, et al.
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Whether Article III jurisdiction extends to cases arising under the Constitution and federal law
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether under Article fll Sect. 2. The judicial Power extends to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under the Constitution, Laws: of the United States, and the United States government are a party. 2. Whether under Article XIV. Section 1.; petitioner’s rights of Due Process of Law and Equal Protections of the Laws were violated by state officials. 3. Whether Article VI. Clause 2., (Supremacy Clause) removes the possibility of all state action being taken in complete absence of all jurisdictions. 4. Whether petitioner has a right under Fed. Rules Civ. Proc. Rule 60(b)(4), when a court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, and parties, denied due process, therefore the issuing court's judgment is VOID. 5. Whether the petitioner rights under Article 1V Section 2. Section 3.2. Const. were denied by defendants prior to state court judgment. 6. Whether the petitioner's rights a (veteran) under (38 U.S.C. 5301(a), (38 U.S.C 511(a), does in fact jurisdictionally prohibit all state court orders (equitable or legal) and all such orders are preempted. 7. Whether 5" Amend. ruling of due process violations, Board of Veterans Appeals, should have also included deny equal protection under the laws. 8. Whether the petitioner is entitled to monetary damages for civil rights violation by state officials under 18 U.S.C. 241; 242, 245. (42 U.S.C. 1983) 9. Whether the petitioner is entitled to monetary damages under (42 U.S.C. 1983) claim for constitutional rights violations and federal law violations by federal officials acting along the side of state officers.