Whether, pursuant to Padilla, counsel is a fortiori constitutionally deficient for failing to notify a United States citizen of the direct and/or collateral consequence of the permanent and categorical loss of a fundamental, individual, and enumerated right to bear arms under the Second Amendment?

Whether the categorical loss of one's Second Amendment rights after a misdemeanor domestic violence conviction is a direct or collateral consequence, and where advisement to a criminal defendant of the consequence lies? Or alternatively, whether Oklahoma law requires courts to advise criminal defendants of all constitutional rights being surrendered by a guilty plea, including the loss of one's Second Amendment rights?

Whether Oklahoma's Uniform Post-Conviction Procedure Act is an inadequate and ineffective independent state law ground to resolve this purely federal question?

Whether counsel is constitutionally deficient for failing to notify a U.S. citizen of the loss of Second Amendment rights due to a misdemeanor domestic violence conviction