No. 23-7232

Quotez Tyvick Pair v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-04-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitution constitutional-rights covid-19 district-court due-process federal-courts judicial-procedure pandemic-restrictions sixth-amendment speedy-trial
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can a United States District Court's general order suspend rights under the Constitution of the United States of America?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. CAN A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT'S GENERAL ORDER SUSPEND RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA? 2. DID THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC SUSPEND THE SIXTH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL? , 3. DID THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC SUSPEND THE SIXTH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES RIGHT TO A PUBLIC TRIAL? _ 4, WAS THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT DUE PROCESS CLAUSE VIOLATED WHEN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT GRANTED A PLAINTIFF'S ORAL MOTION FOR UPWARD VARIANCE — WHILE DENYING DEFENDANT RIGHT TO OBJECT TO ORAL MOTION? . “ie . LIST GF PARTIES : All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. 6 ide

Docket Entries

2024-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2024.
2024-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 16, 2024)

Attorneys

Quotez T. Pair
Quotez Tyvick Pair — Petitioner
Quotez Tyvick Pair — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent