No. 23-7236

Sandra Black v. Naomi Friedrichsen, et al.

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-04-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights court-ruling due-process equal-protection legal-standing pro-se procedural-challenge standing
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-06-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should a black pro se litigant with pauper status genuinely be heard in an American court of law?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . The ESSUE* oe Should a black prose [4f: gant with pawpers | Status Benuinely qf Fase ly be hear A IN an American court oF law e Without question, +his proceeding has been the most heppendous intentional mis carriage oF justice where the civi| Courts have returned bo Tim Crow — ulragsirs retusing a Pre se, ratigent eldecly disaloled AS can Amer, can ber cloy Ya court, Quest ONS. J. \s ar otrat accepted omd usual Cour, oS jadi eval pro ceed: Ags . Loe the | Judge bo comb the decket seeking Cvi dence. to harm the black litigant ; Savoring the white I: tig ants FALSLY.? Nees oth the deSendaits and pleintill qaree that He 3tam chi lelren ARE On the lease, The judge +S wrong « B The State court order Steles + hat the orendehildeen are. on the lease. male ng Aho \udges Sincking Galse. CG. The lease states the grand chiller ae om Ane lease, 0. No here. +o Skit FS knowlege anes the deSendarte ever claim +het the Groma children ate. nol on the lease. Ee, Wud Section ¥ paral rent fa. the grandes Ween on +e. \ease. Ss Poweve ©, Dre ‘hes call troantain edt agar «t He evidence thet tha” grandehildcen were. Nor : on the. lease. Irving illegally in the re home. This ¥ supported white SSendats Claro of i unauthorized occupants,” aga. ast a ere se Mercan Nmeri cans 10 7 ; \ Questons Contd Qa. \si\t an accepted and u ua 6 oS Vuk ra el proceecli n Ss C . “ aan , S cB yudge +o re Suse. to Femove gq harm$ul Falsely in the rig lL+ and the blacle [bigawt FALSLEY in ther og 3. Ave “opia’ ons, And Correct ness 1 i tt i the Sanwa GS Lachual ot Fact BASED? Y Fer the black. pro se LAs ganct. is Fr an accected ond usua | Course oS judica| Proceedings Vat court orders ave Wileanin s\eSS aqarnsy whede_ corporations reetesente d Low ocrtorne ns in a nationwide Gem with unlimited re Sour CES. dj |e il 5. Lohy does + ReauiRE the Sapreme court of Lhe \o.nd +o Stee 5B years oS Karen SF udges Socom eracts S645 Twn Crow . oO STOP THE LIE. Reyeiget + 1S the ASrican American oo Shake Court orders to save white y / . |

Docket Entries

2024-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
2024-04-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 16, 2024)

Attorneys

Sandra Black
Sandra Black — Petitioner