No. 23-7256
John Pedelahore v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure district-court-discretion due-process eighth-amendment federal-sentencing sentencing sentencing-guidelines substantive-reasonableness supervised-release
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred by ordering Mr. Pedelahore to serve 30 months in prison for nonviolent supervised release violations when the recommended range under the Sentencing Guidelines was only three to nine months
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the district court erred by ordering Mr. Pedelahore to serve 30 months in prison for nonviolent supervised release violations when the recommended range under the Sentencing Guidelines was only three to nine months. ii
Docket Entries
2024-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2024.
2024-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-04-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 20, 2024)
Attorneys
John Pedelahore
Leilani Tynes — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Leilani Tynes — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent