No. 23-7259

In Re Quelyory A. Rigal

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-04-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-challenge due-process factual-innocence materiality-threshold newly-discovered-evidence reasonable-juror totality-of-the-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether newly discovered evidence, which directly undermines the reliability of the petitioner's conviction and establishes a plausible claim of factual innocence, meets the materiality threshold necessary to satisfy the demands of the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution, where the evidence creates a substantial likelihood that no reasonable juror, acting fairly, would have convicted the petitioner in light of the totality of the evidence?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether newly discovered evidence, which directly undermines the reliability of the petitioner's conviction and establishes a plausible claim of factual innocence, meets the materiality threshold necessary to satisfy the demands of the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution, where the evidence creates a substantial likelihood that no reasonable juror, acting fairly, would have convicted the petitioner in light of the totality of the evidence? Page 3 of 40

Docket Entries

2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-03-25

Attorneys

Quelyory A. Rigal
Quelyory A. Rigal — Petitioner
Quelyory A. Rigal — Petitioner